<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
    <title>Arizona Bankruptcy Lawyer Blog</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.arizonabankruptcylawyerblog.com/" />
    <link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.arizonabankruptcylawyerblog.com/atom.xml" />
   <id>tag:www.arizonabankruptcylawyerblog.com,2010://259</id>
    <link rel="service.post" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.arizonabankruptcylawyerblog.com/cgi-bin/mt-atom.cgi/weblog/blog_id=259" title="Arizona Bankruptcy Lawyer Blog" />
    <updated>2010-07-31T22:16:05Z</updated>
    <subtitle>Published by Michael S. Anderson P.C.</subtitle>
    <generator uri="http://www.sixapart.com/movabletype/">Movable Type 3.33</generator>
 
<entry>
    <title>Debts not discharged in a chapter 7 bankruptcy if the creditor objects</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.arizonabankruptcylawyerblog.com/2010/07/some_debts_will_be_discharged.html" />
    <link rel="service.edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.arizonabankruptcylawyerblog.com/cgi-bin/mt-atom.cgi/weblog/blog_id=259/entry_id=83186" title="Debts not discharged in a chapter 7 bankruptcy if the creditor objects" />
    <id>tag:www.arizonabankruptcylawyerblog.com,2010://259.83186</id>
    
    <published>2010-07-31T22:11:28Z</published>
    <updated>2010-07-31T22:16:05Z</updated>
    
    <summary>Some debts will be discharged in a chapter 7 bankruptcy case UNLESS the creditor files a complaint and obtains a court order that the debtor will remain responsible for the debt after the case is over. The debts that are...</summary>
    <author>
        <name>Michael S. Anderson</name>
        
    </author>
            <category term="Bankruptcy Basic Questions" />
            <category term="Chapter 7 Bankruptcy" />
            <category term="Creditor Rights and Bankruptcy" />
    
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.arizonabankruptcylawyerblog.com/">
        <![CDATA[<p>Some debts will be discharged in a chapter 7 bankruptcy case UNLESS the creditor files a complaint and obtains a court order that the debtor will remain responsible for the debt after the case is over.</p>

<p>The debts that are not dischargable if the creditor successfully challenges discharge are typically:</p>

<p>1.  <u>Debts that arise as a result of a fraudulent action.  This includes</u>:</p>

<p>a.  Debts that are the result of an intentionally fraudulent act in which the creditor relied on the deceit in it's extension of credit.  Examples:</p>

<p>-  Debtor obtained the loan and promised to pay back when had no intention to do so (this is common i.e. borrowing money against a line of credit or credit card when the debtor knows they are insolvent and unable to pay and/or is going to file for bankruptcy)<br />
-  Debtor borrowed an item and used it as collateral for a loan<br />
-  Debtor wrote a check for an item, stopped payment on the check and kept the item<br />
-  Debtor wrote a check when funds in the account were insufficient then promised the seller<br />
the check was good</p>

<p>b.  Recent credit card charges that were used to buy luxury items.</p>

<p>- The law presumes...that a debt is fraudulent if it was more than 550.00 from any particular creditor for a luxury good or service within 90 days prior to filing the bankruptcy</p>

<p>c.  Debts incurred based on a false written document about financial condition.  Requirements:</p>

<p>- The statement must be in writing obviously.<br />
- It must have been "material"  i.e. a very important factor in the creditors decision to extend <br />
credit.  (overstatement of income is a common material false statement)<br />
- The false statement must relate to financial condition<br />
- There must have been an intent to deceive the creditor<br />
- The creditor must have reasonably relied on the statement</p>

<p><br />
 </p>]]>
        <![CDATA[<p>d.  Recent cash advances</p>

<p>- A cash advance on an "open end" account that is more than $825 within<br />
70 days prior to filing for bankruptcy, is not dischargeable.</p>

<p>2.  <u>Debts that arise as a result of Debtor's willful and malicious act</u>:</p>

<p>a.  If the debtor both intended to cause a specific injury to a person or property, the <br />
debt isn't dischargeable if the creditor objects.  Common examples are debts arising<br />
from, arson, vandalism, assault, and rape.    If the debtor is simply "careless" i.e. <br />
texting while driving causing an accident, the debt will likely be dischargeable over<br />
the creditor objection.</p>

<p>3.  <u>Unlisted Creditors</u></p>

<p>a.  Bankruptcy law requires full disclosure.  This includes disclosure of everyone owed.  If the creditor isn't listed, they can't get notice and therefore aren't discharged.  There are a few exceptions to this:</p>

<p>-  If the creditor knew or should have known about the bankruptcy filing.<br />
-  If all the debtor's assets are exempt.  As the creditor wouldn't have benefited from the notice anyway where there is no money to share.  However, if the failure to notice the creditor prevented the creditor from objecting to the discharge for fraud or one of the other reasons stated above,  the debt may survive.</p>

<p>4. <u> Debtor resulting from embezzlement, larceny, or breach of fiduciary duty.</u></p>

<p>a.  Embezzlement  is what happens when property held for the benefit of another is used by the debtor who is holding the property, for his or her own purposes.</p>

<p>b.  Larceny is theft.</p>

<p>c.  Breach of fiduciary duty - failure to live up to a duty to manage property or money for another where the debtor's relationship is close like, husband and wife, guardian and ward, executor of an estate and the beneficiary, and attorney/client.</p>]]>
    </content>
</entry>
<entry>
    <title>Arizona Chapter 7 Bankruptcy - Which Debts are &quot;discharged&quot;?</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.arizonabankruptcylawyerblog.com/2010/07/arizona_chapter_7_bankruptcy_w.html" />
    <link rel="service.edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.arizonabankruptcylawyerblog.com/cgi-bin/mt-atom.cgi/weblog/blog_id=259/entry_id=83185" title="Arizona Chapter 7 Bankruptcy - Which Debts are &quot;discharged&quot;?" />
    <id>tag:www.arizonabankruptcylawyerblog.com,2010://259.83185</id>
    
    <published>2010-07-29T22:01:31Z</published>
    <updated>2010-07-29T22:03:58Z</updated>
    
    <summary>In a chapter 7 bankruptcy the debtor is able to &quot;discharge&quot; or cancel the obligation to pay certain debts. These debts typically include: credit card medical bill personal loan deficiency balances car repossessed deficiency balances other personal property repossessed deficiency...</summary>
    <author>
        <name>Michael S. Anderson</name>
        
    </author>
            <category term="Bankruptcy Basic Questions" />
            <category term="Chapter 7 Bankruptcy" />
    
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.arizonabankruptcylawyerblog.com/">
        <![CDATA[<p>In a chapter 7 bankruptcy the debtor is able to "discharge" or cancel the obligation to pay certain debts.  These debts typically include:</p>

<p>credit card<br />
medical bill<br />
personal loan<br />
deficiency balances car repossessed<br />
deficiency balances other personal property repossessed<br />
deficiency balances on home foreclosure<br />
certain tax debt<br />
student loans for which the debtor can prove a "hardship"</p>

<p>The real question is, what debt is going to survive the debtor's attempt to discharge in the chapter 7 bankruptcy?</p>]]>
        <![CDATA[<p>The most common debts that don't meet the discharge criteria are these:</p>

<p>debt incurred to pay non dischargeable tax debt<br />
court imposed fines<br />
back child support and spousal maintenance<br />
debts owed as part of a marital settlement or division of debt decree in divorce proceeding<br />
loans owed to a pension plan<br />
student loans<br />
certain tax debt<br />
debts for injuries or death related to drunk driving<br />
debt incurred fraudulently</p>

<p>Some of these non dischargeable debts can be more successfully dealt with either discharged or paid via terms that are more friendly than outside bankruptcy in a chapter 13 bankruptcy case.</p>]]>
    </content>
</entry>
<entry>
    <title>Bankruptcy and the &quot;co-debtor&quot; stay</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.arizonabankruptcylawyerblog.com/2010/07/bankruptcy_and_the_codebtor_st.html" />
    <link rel="service.edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.arizonabankruptcylawyerblog.com/cgi-bin/mt-atom.cgi/weblog/blog_id=259/entry_id=82553" title="Bankruptcy and the &quot;co-debtor&quot; stay" />
    <id>tag:www.arizonabankruptcylawyerblog.com,2010://259.82553</id>
    
    <published>2010-07-28T00:05:53Z</published>
    <updated>2010-07-28T00:11:43Z</updated>
    
    <summary>If someone &quot;co-signs&quot; a contract in order to help a friend or family member get a loan, that co-signer is legally liable to pay the debt and his or her credit report will reflect that. What if the borrower files...</summary>
    <author>
        <name>Michael S. Anderson</name>
        
    </author>
            <category term="Bankruptcy Basic Questions" />
            <category term="Bankruptcy Discharge" />
    
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.arizonabankruptcylawyerblog.com/">
        <![CDATA[<p>If someone "co-signs" a contract in order to help a friend or family member get a loan, that co-signer is legally liable to pay the debt and his or her credit report will reflect that. </p>

<p>What if the borrower files for bankruptcy?  A few important points:</p>

<p>1.  The cosigner is considered a codebtor both inside and outside of bankruptcy.  </p>

<p>2.  The creditor can legally pursue the codebtor for payment even if a chapter 7 bankruptcy is filed.  There is no automatic stay protection for the codebtor in a chapter 7 bankruptcy.</p>

<p>3.  The creditor can only pursue a codebtor if the borrower files a chapter 13 bankruptcy case in certain circumstances, as follows:</p>

<p>a.  The case is over and the debt wasn't paid in full during the plan.<br />
b.  The codebtor is the one who received the consideration for loan i.e. actually owns the car.<br />
c.  The loan isn't being paid back during the plan.<br />
d.  The creditor can convince the Judge that it's interests will be "irreparably harmed" by continuation of the codebtor stay.<br />
e.  If the debt arose in the ordinary course of business and is not a consumer debt.</p>

<p>If you are considering bankruptcy and have a codebtor, you should speak to your attorney about the effect the bankruptcy filing will have both on the codebtor's credit and requirement to pay the debt.</p>

<p><br />
</p>]]>
        
    </content>
</entry>
<entry>
    <title>Chapter 13 Bankruptcy - What cannot be &quot;crammed&quot; down</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.arizonabankruptcylawyerblog.com/2010/07/chapter_13_bankruptcy_what_can.html" />
    <link rel="service.edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.arizonabankruptcylawyerblog.com/cgi-bin/mt-atom.cgi/weblog/blog_id=259/entry_id=82531" title="Chapter 13 Bankruptcy - What cannot be &quot;crammed&quot; down" />
    <id>tag:www.arizonabankruptcylawyerblog.com,2010://259.82531</id>
    
    <published>2010-07-25T22:19:11Z</published>
    <updated>2010-07-25T22:31:06Z</updated>
    
    <summary>Amounts paid on certain debts secured by assets can be reduced in a chapter 13 bankruptcy. The most common are: 1. Car loans entered into more than 910 days prior to the filing of a chapter 13 bankruptcy. 2. Second...</summary>
    <author>
        <name>Michael S. Anderson</name>
        
    </author>
            <category term="Bankruptcy Basic Questions" />
            <category term="Chapter 13 Bankruptcy" />
    
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.arizonabankruptcylawyerblog.com/">
        <![CDATA[<p>Amounts paid on certain debts secured by assets can be reduced in a chapter 13 bankruptcy.  The most common are:</p>

<p>1.  Car loans entered into more than 910 days prior to the filing of a chapter 13 bankruptcy.</p>

<p>2.  Second mortgages on homes where the home value is less then the debt owed on the first mortgage.</p>

<p>A reduction or "cram down" as it is commonly known is not available to reduce the following loans in a chapter 13:</p>

<p>1.   First Mortgages </p>

<p>2.  If the creditor has a "purchase money security interest" in the property (money lent to buy the property in question:</p>

<p>a.  loans for motor vehicles that were purchased for personal use within about 2.5 years                                                                                  of the filing date.</p>

<p>b.  loans for any other property purchased within 1 year of the filing date.</p>

<p>For these items, the full amount of the debt has to be paid to the creditor through the plan in order to keep the property. </p>]]>
        
    </content>
</entry>
<entry>
    <title>Chapter 13 Bankruptcy - What has to be paid?</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.arizonabankruptcylawyerblog.com/2010/07/chapter_13_bankruptcy_what_has.html" />
    <link rel="service.edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.arizonabankruptcylawyerblog.com/cgi-bin/mt-atom.cgi/weblog/blog_id=259/entry_id=83182" title="Chapter 13 Bankruptcy - What has to be paid?" />
    <id>tag:www.arizonabankruptcylawyerblog.com,2010://259.83182</id>
    
    <published>2010-07-25T21:26:11Z</published>
    <updated>2010-07-25T21:51:40Z</updated>
    
    <summary>A well developed and successful chapter 13 plan often results in:

1.  full payoff of priority debt
2.  full payoff of car loans and home arrears
3.  a large reduction of debt paid to unsecured creditors
4.  protection of assets that would have been lost in a chapter 7</summary>
    <author>
        <name>Michael S. Anderson</name>
        
    </author>
            <category term="Bankruptcy Cases" />
            <category term="Chapter 13 Bankruptcy" />
    
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.arizonabankruptcylawyerblog.com/">
        <![CDATA[<p>When a chapter 13 case is filed, a "plan" must be proposed that tells the court and creditors how each debt is going to be treated i.e. paid or not, how much and when.  </p>

<p>How each type of debt is treated, depends on the bankruptcy code and case law.  Generally,  a chapter 13 filer must have enough income to pay the following in full:</p>

<p>1.  Living Expenses</p>

<p>The law assumes that you need a certain amount of money to pay for your "reasonable" living expenses.  What is considered to be reasonable is litigated around the country each week.  In Arizona, your reasonable living expenses typically includes: mortgage, food, utilities, insurances, out of pocket medical care costs,  upkeep on home, hoa dues, property tax, child care, spousal maintenance, daycare, costs related to maintaining your small business, or related to your employment, gas and upkeep on car, laundry, mandatory withholdings at work, car lease and a few other items.  These items are paid outside the plan of course.</p>

<p>2.  Car Loan</p>

<p>Car payments are paid through the chapter 13 plan as part of the plan payment.  The plan will often change the treatment of the car loan creditor.  The law often allows for the debtor to pay less in principal and or interest and the length of the loan payout is either shortened or lengthened.</p>

<p>3.  "Priority" Debt</p>

<p>Certain taxes, child support, spousal maintenance are the most common debts that must be paid in full through the plan.</p>

<p>4.  Tax Lien</p>

<p>If a taxing entity has properly recorded a tax lien and the debtor has assets with value, the tax lien will have to be paid through the plan with interest.</p>

<p>5.  Mortgage Arrears</p>

<p>If behind on a home loan, the amount that is owed will be paid as part of the plan payment and any foreclosure will be stopped while the payments are made.</p>

<p>6.  Value of Non Exempt Assets</p>

<p>If the debtor has a asset that is not considered "protected" under state law,  in order to create a viable chapter 13 plan, unsecured creditors must be paid it's value during the plan.  If the debtor has an antique jukebox worth 10000.00, these creditors will need to be paid 10000.00 during the plan or give the jukebox up to the chapter 13 trustee for sale and distribution as in a chapter 7 bankruptcy.</p>]]>
        <![CDATA[<p>7.  Disposable Monthly Income</p>

<p>The debtor must also pay unsecured creditors their "extra" income as determined by various and required budget and income calculations IF the resulting number is greater then the proposed amount to the unsecured creditors to protect the non exempt asset.  Many debtors pay very little to the pool of unsecured creditors.  </p>

<p>8.  Fees</p>

<p>Attorney and Trustee fees paid through the plan.</p>

<p>A well developed and successful chapter 13 plan often results in:</p>

<p>1.  full payoff of priority debt<br />
2.  full payoff of car loans and home arrears<br />
3.  a large reduction of debt paid to unsecured creditors<br />
4.  protection of assets that would have been lost in a chapter 7</p>]]>
    </content>
</entry>
<entry>
    <title>Chapter 13 Bankruptcy - Pay less then owed on your car and keep it</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.arizonabankruptcylawyerblog.com/2010/07/chapter_13_bankruptcy_pay_less_1.html" />
    <link rel="service.edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.arizonabankruptcylawyerblog.com/cgi-bin/mt-atom.cgi/weblog/blog_id=259/entry_id=82522" title="Chapter 13 Bankruptcy - Pay less then owed on your car and keep it" />
    <id>tag:www.arizonabankruptcylawyerblog.com,2010://259.82522</id>
    
    <published>2010-07-23T21:58:05Z</published>
    <updated>2010-07-23T22:00:46Z</updated>
    
    <summary>If a car was purchased more than 910 days prior to the date a chapter 13 bankruptcy case is filed and the car is worth less then what the bank is owed, the debtor should be able to change the...</summary>
    <author>
        <name>Michael S. Anderson</name>
        
    </author>
            <category term="Bankruptcy Basic Questions" />
            <category term="Chapter 13 Bankruptcy" />
    
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.arizonabankruptcylawyerblog.com/">
        <![CDATA[<p>If a car was purchased more than 910 days prior to the date a chapter 13 bankruptcy case is filed and the car is worth less then what the bank is owed, the debtor should be able to change the amount it pays the creditor on the car in the chapter 13 case as follows:</p>

<p>1.  Instead of paying the full loan amount, the debtor can pay the bank the value of the car over the length of the chapter 13 plan.</p>

<p>2.  Instead of paying the original interest rate, the debtor can pay the bank the "prime plus rate" or the national prime rate plus a specific rate adjustment for risk of non payment.  (hovers at around 4.5 to 5.0% now)  <a href="http://www.law.cornell.edu/supct/html/02-1016.ZS.html">See Till v. SCS Credit Corp 541 U.S. 465, 124 S. Ct. 1951, 158 L.Ed.2d 787 (2004).</a>  (Can the debtor cram down the interest rate on a car purchased within 910 days?  topic for another entry)</p>

<p>3.  The unsecured portion of the debt is treated as any other unsecured debt and shares in the funds set aside for unsecured creditors, an amount that may be very small.</p>

<p>The ability to file a chapter 13 bankruptcy and thereby change the treatment on a car loan, can be a major benefit to a debtor who has a steady income and an upside down vehicle.  </p>]]>
        
    </content>
</entry>
<entry>
    <title>A Pennsylvania District Court rules that employer can discriminate in the hiring process as a result of bankruptcy filing</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.arizonabankruptcylawyerblog.com/2010/07/not_so_fast_a_pennsylvania_cou.html" />
    <link rel="service.edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.arizonabankruptcylawyerblog.com/cgi-bin/mt-atom.cgi/weblog/blog_id=259/entry_id=82362" title="A Pennsylvania District Court rules that employer can discriminate in the hiring process as a result of bankruptcy filing" />
    <id>tag:www.arizonabankruptcylawyerblog.com,2010://259.82362</id>
    
    <published>2010-07-20T22:49:24Z</published>
    <updated>2010-07-20T23:00:51Z</updated>
    
    <summary>According to Attorney Craig Andresen at bankruptcylawnetwork.com a Pennsylvania District court has ruled that a private employer MAY refuse to hire a job applicant solely because the applicant filed for bankruptcy in the past. See Rea v. Federated Investors, 2010...</summary>
    <author>
        <name>Michael S. Anderson</name>
        
    </author>
            <category term="Bankruptcy Basic Questions" />
            <category term="Employment and Bankruptcy" />
    
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.arizonabankruptcylawyerblog.com/">
        <![CDATA[<p>According to Attorney Craig Andresen at <a href="http://bankruptcylawnetwork.com">bankruptcylawnetwork.com</a>   a Pennsylvania District court has ruled that a private employer MAY refuse to hire a job applicant solely because the applicant filed for bankruptcy in the past.  See Rea v. Federated Investors, 2010 WL 370334 (W.D.Penn. Jan. 29, 2010)</p>

<p>The Court's language..."while section 525(b) does indeed prevent employers from discriminating against current employees based upon a bankruptcy filing, the unique wording of this section allows bankruptcy discrimination in the hiring process."</p>

<p>You can read Mr. Andresen's article <a href="http://www.bankruptcylawnetwork.com/2010/07/14/refusal-to-hire-based-upon-bankruptcy-filing-approved-by-pennsylvania-court/">here</a>.  </p>]]>
        
    </content>
</entry>
<entry>
    <title>8 bankruptcy do&apos;s and dont&apos;s</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.arizonabankruptcylawyerblog.com/2010/07/considering_bankruptcy_basic_d.html" />
    <link rel="service.edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.arizonabankruptcylawyerblog.com/cgi-bin/mt-atom.cgi/weblog/blog_id=259/entry_id=82547" title="8 bankruptcy do's and dont's" />
    <id>tag:www.arizonabankruptcylawyerblog.com,2010://259.82547</id>
    
    <published>2010-07-18T23:01:10Z</published>
    <updated>2010-07-20T22:02:47Z</updated>
    
    <summary>If you have serious debt and feel that bankruptcy may be in your future, be aware of the following: 1. You should avoid borrowing money or withdrawing money from your IRA, 401k or ERISA qualified retirement plans to pay the...</summary>
    <author>
        <name>Michael S. Anderson</name>
        
    </author>
            <category term="Assets and Bankruptcy" />
            <category term="Bankruptcy Basic Questions" />
    
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.arizonabankruptcylawyerblog.com/">
        <![CDATA[<p>If you have serious debt and feel that bankruptcy may be in your future, be aware of the following:</p>

<p>1.  You should avoid borrowing money or withdrawing money from your IRA, 401k or ERISA qualified retirement plans to pay the debt. These funds should be safe in a bankruptcy case.</p>

<p>2.  Don't borrow money on your home's equity to pay your bills. </p>

<p>3.  If you owe friends, family, or business associates money, don't pay them back within one year before you file (unless less than 600.00).  This is considered a "preference" and the money can be recovered form those close to you for distribution to all of your creditors in the bankruptcy case.</p>

<p>4.  Don't put property into someone else's name or give an asset away.  This type of transfer could be considered fraudulent and cause you to lose the discharge and the asset.</p>

<p>5.  If you typically get a large tax refund, think about increasing net income monthly in order to get a smaller refund.  It will be property of the bankruptcy estate.  If the refund is the result of earned income tax credit, you may be able to request that it be paid in your paycheck.  </p>

<p>6.  Don't reduce the withholding so much that you end up with a large tax bill either.</p>

<p>7.  Continue to make payment on cars and real estate you need to keep.</p>

<p>8.  Lastly, get good advice from an experienced bankruptcy attorney sooner rather then later.  The longer you wait to get advice, the narrower your choices will be.</p>]]>
        
    </content>
</entry>
<entry>
    <title>Factors you should consider in hiring a bankruptcy attorney</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.arizonabankruptcylawyerblog.com/2010/07/factors_you_should_consider_in.html" />
    <link rel="service.edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.arizonabankruptcylawyerblog.com/cgi-bin/mt-atom.cgi/weblog/blog_id=259/entry_id=81936" title="Factors you should consider in hiring a bankruptcy attorney" />
    <id>tag:www.arizonabankruptcylawyerblog.com,2010://259.81936</id>
    
    <published>2010-07-17T13:11:48Z</published>
    <updated>2010-07-17T13:16:04Z</updated>
    
    <summary>Hiring a bankruptcy attorney is a big deal. An incorrect bit of advice can have serious consequences. In my opinion, fees and good sales technique shouldn&apos;t be determining factors in making the choice. This is my short list of what...</summary>
    <author>
        <name>Michael S. Anderson</name>
        
    </author>
            <category term="Bankruptcy Basic Questions" />
    
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.arizonabankruptcylawyerblog.com/">
        <![CDATA[<p>Hiring a bankruptcy attorney is a big deal.  An incorrect bit of advice can have serious consequences.  In my opinion, fees and good sales technique shouldn't be determining factors in making the choice.  This is my short list of what should be:</p>

<p>1.  How many cases has the attorney personally been responsible for?</p>

<p>2.  How many chapter 13 cases has the attorney aided to confirmation?</p>

<p>3.  Does the attorney file claims against creditors in consumer cases?</p>

<p>4.  Does the attorney litigate, i.e. file motions, appear in Court for hearings etc?</p>

<p>5.  How long has the attorney been practicing and practicing consumer bankruptcy law?</p>

<p>6.  Does the attorney personally meet with you more than once, personally prepare documents and discuss your options personally after the analysis is complete, or turn most work over to paralegals?</p>

<p>7.  Does the attorney or staff "sell" bankruptcy to you or educate you about your options and the pros and cons of each?</p>

<p>8.  Is the attorney directly accessible, or do you have to move through "guardians" to reach him or her?</p>

<p>9.  Bar Complaints?</p>]]>
        
    </content>
</entry>
<entry>
    <title>Means Test  Basics</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.arizonabankruptcylawyerblog.com/2010/07/means_test_basics.html" />
    <link rel="service.edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.arizonabankruptcylawyerblog.com/cgi-bin/mt-atom.cgi/weblog/blog_id=259/entry_id=81934" title="Means Test  Basics" />
    <id>tag:www.arizonabankruptcylawyerblog.com,2010://259.81934</id>
    
    <published>2010-07-16T13:30:00Z</published>
    <updated>2010-07-23T18:08:48Z</updated>
    
    <summary>The Bankruptcy Abuse Prevention and Consumer Protection Act of 2005, commonly known as BAPCPA, imposed a &quot;means test&quot; on those filing bankruptcy. This means test primarily determines whether the chapter 7 filing is &quot;presumptively abusive&quot;. In order to determine whether...</summary>
    <author>
        <name>Michael S. Anderson</name>
        
    </author>
            <category term="Bankruptcy Basic Questions" />
            <category term="Means Test and Bankruptcy" />
    
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.arizonabankruptcylawyerblog.com/">
        <![CDATA[<p>The Bankruptcy Abuse Prevention and Consumer Protection Act of 2005, commonly known as BAPCPA, imposed a "means test" on those filing bankruptcy.  This means test primarily determines whether the chapter 7 filing is "presumptively abusive". </p>

<p>In order to determine whether a presumption of abuse exists, the debtor's current monthly disposable income (as determined by the means test itself) is multiplied by 60.  If that amount is is equal to or greater than the lesser of $10,000 or 25 percent of the debtor's non priority unsecured debt, the presumption of abuse exists.</p>

<p>Presumptively Abusive doesn't mean that the filer is a bad person...it just means that if the filer were allowed to stay in the chapter 7 bankruptcy and gain a discharge of debt,  the law wouldn't be followed.  </p>

<p>If the filing fails the means test,  the filer will have to convert to or file in the first place a chapter 13 bankruptcy, and pay a specific amount based on a form of the same test to unsecured creditors over what is typically a 5 year period UNLESS the filer is able to successfully rebut the presumption of abuse.</p>

<p>This means test only applies to individuals not businesses, and only if the debt is primarily consumer debt, or debt incurred by the individual for personal, family or household reasons.  If the debt is primarily non consumer i.e. for the purpose of earning a profit or involuntary like tax debt, the means test shouldn't apply.</p>]]>
        
    </content>
</entry>
<entry>
    <title>Can I lose my job because I filed a bankruptcy case?</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.arizonabankruptcylawyerblog.com/2010/07/can_i_lose_my_job_because_i_fi.html" />
    <link rel="service.edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.arizonabankruptcylawyerblog.com/cgi-bin/mt-atom.cgi/weblog/blog_id=259/entry_id=81926" title="Can I lose my job because I filed a bankruptcy case?" />
    <id>tag:www.arizonabankruptcylawyerblog.com,2010://259.81926</id>
    
    <published>2010-07-14T13:30:00Z</published>
    <updated>2010-07-14T17:32:03Z</updated>
    
    <summary>Congress inserted a provision in the bankruptcy code preventing the loss of a job because of a bankruptcy filing. The reasoning appears to be based on a belief that the intended fresh start provided by bankruptcy, wouldn&apos;t be complete without...</summary>
    <author>
        <name>Michael S. Anderson</name>
        
    </author>
            <category term="Bankruptcy Basic Questions" />
            <category term="Employment and Bankruptcy" />
    
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.arizonabankruptcylawyerblog.com/">
        <![CDATA[<p>Congress inserted a provision in the bankruptcy code preventing the loss of a job because of a bankruptcy filing.  The reasoning appears to be based on a belief that the intended fresh start provided by bankruptcy, wouldn't be complete without job security.</p>

<p>The current version of the code section can be found at 11 U.S.C. sec. 525(b) and partially reads as follows:</p>

<p>"No private employer may terminate the employment of, or discriminate with respect to employment against, an individual who is or has been a debtor under this title, a debtor or bankrupt under the Bankruptcy Act, or an individual associated with such debtor or bankrupt."</p>

<p>The weak spot for employees, especially in "at will" employment states like Az. is that the employer can fire for other reasons including those related to a person's financial history.</p>

<p>If an employee were to sue an employer for a violation of this code section post bankruptcy,  he or she would have to prove that the bankruptcy was the sole reason for the firing.</p>

<p>If you think you need to file for bankruptcy, but are concerned about this issue, not only do you need to keep good employment records but you also need to have an experienced attorney help you weigh out all the pros of filing vs all the negative potential consequences including job loss.  The choice to file will ultimately be your own.<br />
</p>]]>
        
    </content>
</entry>
<entry>
    <title>Arizona Bankruptcy Exemptions - What are they?</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.arizonabankruptcylawyerblog.com/2010/07/arizona_bankruptcy_exemptions.html" />
    <link rel="service.edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.arizonabankruptcylawyerblog.com/cgi-bin/mt-atom.cgi/weblog/blog_id=259/entry_id=82113" title="Arizona Bankruptcy Exemptions - What are they?" />
    <id>tag:www.arizonabankruptcylawyerblog.com,2010://259.82113</id>
    
    <published>2010-07-13T21:22:10Z</published>
    <updated>2010-07-26T02:17:31Z</updated>
    
    <summary>Most chapter 7 bankruptcy cases filed in the U.S. are considered &quot;no asset&quot; cases. &quot;No asset&quot;, is a term lawyers and others involved in the bankruptcy process call chapter 7 cases in which there are no assets available for the...</summary>
    <author>
        <name>Michael S. Anderson</name>
        
    </author>
            <category term="Assets and Bankruptcy" />
            <category term="Bankruptcy Basic Questions" />
    
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.arizonabankruptcylawyerblog.com/">
        <![CDATA[<p>Most chapter 7 bankruptcy cases filed in the U.S. are considered "no asset" cases.  "No asset", is a term lawyers and others involved in the bankruptcy process call chapter 7 cases in which there are no assets available for the chapter 7 trustee to sell and share with creditors either because they are legally "exempt" or just not worth the time.  </p>

<p>So a basic question:  What does the law protect?</p>

<p>A good place to start is to read a basic list of Arizona bankruptcy exemptions.  The U.S. Bankruptcy Court updates a list every so often and has done so as recently as May 2010.  Read it <a href="http://www.azb.uscourts.gov/Documents/arizona_exemptions.pdf">here</a>.</p>

<p>Some interesting points about this list:</p>

<p>1. Most major assets Arizona consumers own are exempt in a chapter 7 bankruptcy case.</p>

<p>-  Homes - possibly 150000 in equity is exempt (equity =value minus the bank loan)<br />
-  Cars - 5000 in equity per person<br />
-  Most retirement plan/accounts</p>

<p></p>

<p></p>

<p></p>

<p><br />
 </p>]]>
        <![CDATA[<p>2.  "Assets" arguably include some things you wouldn't normally think of like:<br />
-  assets transferred to family or friends within a certain period of time prior to filing<br />
-  money paid to creditors within a certain period of time prior to filing<br />
-  claims that may exist at the time of filing the case but are unknown - claims against creditors,                personal injury claims<br />
-   tax refunds owed to the debtor</p>

<p>3.  Some assets that aren't exempt can be liquidated and "spent" in certain ways to benefit the debtor prior to filing the chapter 7 bankruptcy.  (Tread Carefully)</p>

<p>4. In a chapter 13 bankruptcy, you can voluntarily surrender non exempt assets or protect the value of non exempt assets by paying the value to unsecured creditors during the plan.  </p>

<p>5. Arizona is an "opt-out" state.  This means that it has chosen not to use federal bankruptcy exemptions.  Arizonans can only use state exemptions and federal non bankruptcy statutes that may protect certain assets.</p>

<p>6. Arizona bankruptcy filers can only claim the Arizona exemptions if they were domiciled (lived) in Arizona for two years before filing.   If they weren't, they must use the exemptions provided by the state where they were domiciled the longest during a period  between 2 and 2.5 years prior to the filing date. Confusing...I know, and it gets more confusing if the state the law forces the debtor to use, doesn't allow non residents to use their exemptions, or if the exemption scheme is complex.  </p>]]>
    </content>
</entry>
<entry>
    <title>Full Disclosure in Bankruptcy is Mandatory</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.arizonabankruptcylawyerblog.com/2010/07/honesty_when_filing_bankruptcy.html" />
    <link rel="service.edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.arizonabankruptcylawyerblog.com/cgi-bin/mt-atom.cgi/weblog/blog_id=259/entry_id=50281" title="Full Disclosure in Bankruptcy is Mandatory" />
    <id>tag:www.arizonabankruptcylawyerblog.com,2009://259.50281</id>
    
    <published>2010-07-11T06:05:57Z</published>
    <updated>2010-07-13T23:55:44Z</updated>
    
    <summary>It is a crime to hide information about assets from the bankruptcy court. Bankruptcy Fraud is the common term. Read about it at 18 USC 152(3) The first few lines of this section of U.S. Code read: A person who—...</summary>
    <author>
        <name>Michael S. Anderson</name>
        
    </author>
            <category term="Bankruptcy Basic Questions" />
    
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.arizonabankruptcylawyerblog.com/">
        <![CDATA[<p>It is a crime to hide information about assets from the bankruptcy court.  Bankruptcy Fraud is the common term.  Read about it at <a href="http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/html/uscode18/usc_sec_18_00000152----000-.html">18 USC 152(3)</a></p>

<p>The first few lines of this section of U.S. Code read:</p>

<p>A person who—<br />
(1) knowingly and fraudulently conceals from a custodian, trustee, marshal, or other officer of the court charged with the control or custody of property, or, in connection with a case under title 11, from creditors or the United States Trustee, any property belonging to the estate of a debtor;<br />
(2) knowingly and fraudulently makes a false oath or account in or in relation to any case under title 11;<br />
(3) knowingly and fraudulently makes a false declaration, certificate, verification, or statement under penalty of perjury as permitted under section 1746 of title 28, in or in relation to any case under title 11; </p>

<p>the last line reads:</p>

<p>"shall be fined under this title, imprisoned not more than 5 years, or both".</p>

<p>Just a few weeks ago a woman in Idaho was indicted on fraud charges related to a bankruptcy case she had filed in 2005.  See <a href="http://www.kxly.com/news/23950168/detail.html">Former Mullan Woman Charged with Bankruptcy Fraud</a></p>

<p>She seems to have attempted to hide a house.  I would imagine that a house is hard to hide, although I've never tried.  </p>

<p>She obviously hadn't sought some basic legal counsel prior to her decision or simply didn't want to believe the counsel she received.  </p>

<p>In my experience,  the former is common but the latter problem is as well.  Often, a potential bankruptcy filer will whisper  "just between you and me",  and then proceed to tell me about an item that may have been signed over to an old friend.</p>

<p>  </p>

<p></p>

<p></p>

<p></p>

<p></p>

<p></p>

<p></p>

<p></p>

<p><br />
</p>]]>
        <![CDATA[<p>The inevitable follow up...,  "if they can't find it why do I have to disclose it,  I mean are they going to come to my house"?</p>

<p>A house visit is unlikely, but as an officer of the court, no attorney in their right mind is going to collude with that client in hiding the asset.  Yet, I am certain that a few bankruptcy filers try it anyway after being told what could happen.</p>

<p>If you are considering bankruptcy, it will be a wise move to just tell your attorney everything...Just go overboard.  You will be surprised that many things are protected in bankruptcy, can be protected in a chapter 13, or can be dealt with in some other legal manner.  </p>]]>
    </content>
</entry>
<entry>
    <title>4 Common Mistakes When Filing Bankruptcy On Your Own</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.arizonabankruptcylawyerblog.com/2010/07/4_common_mistakes_when_filing.html" />
    <link rel="service.edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.arizonabankruptcylawyerblog.com/cgi-bin/mt-atom.cgi/weblog/blog_id=259/entry_id=81895" title="4 Common Mistakes When Filing Bankruptcy On Your Own" />
    <id>tag:www.arizonabankruptcylawyerblog.com,2010://259.81895</id>
    
    <published>2010-07-11T00:16:06Z</published>
    <updated>2010-07-12T00:51:31Z</updated>
    
    <summary>A bankruptcy case can be planned and filed by the debtor without the aid of counsel. It happens quite often. In very simple cases, (some would argue that there isn&apos;t such a thing), the debtor sans counsel may escape unscathed,...</summary>
    <author>
        <name>Michael S. Anderson</name>
        
    </author>
            <category term="Bankruptcy Basic Questions" />
    
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.arizonabankruptcylawyerblog.com/">
        <![CDATA[<p>A bankruptcy case can be planned and filed by the debtor without the aid of counsel.  It happens quite often.  </p>

<p>In very simple cases, (some would argue that there isn't such a thing),  the debtor sans counsel may escape unscathed, but may do so without really understanding the perils they encountered.  Bankruptcy law is full of traps that the average filer and even many attorneys aren't aware of.   It isn't just a simple matter of "filling out forms".</p>

<p>Some of the more common and serious problems I see when contacted by a debtor who has filed his or her own case are the following:</p>]]>
        <![CDATA[<p>1.  Property is not listed on the schedules</p>

<p>Often the debtor fails to list every asset they own.  The question of whether something is an asset or not can be a tricky, or at least easily overlooked.  Examples of overlooked items include:</p>

<p>-  an interest in a probate estate<br />
-  potential lawsuits against creditors, ex business partners, etc.<br />
-  items awarded via divorce decree<br />
-  stock options  <br />
-  trust funds<br />
-  property transferred without recompense to others</p>

<p>2.  Missing Creditors</p>

<p>Many debtors that file on their own, think they can simply not disclose a creditor to the Court.  Usually the creditor is a family member, friend, a well liked dentist, etc.  Unfortunately, it doesn't work like that.  Everyone goes in the pot and the law determines how they are treated in an effort to treat all similarly situation creditors....well...similarly.   </p>

<p>3.  Asset Transfers</p>

<p>The law surrounding asset transfers can be complex.  Many of us give things away with no intention to hide the asset from creditors.  We are just kind right?.  The law though, assumes that if you give something away it is with a bad intention, if it was done within a certain period of time and it's market value wasn't given in return.  One of the most common questions I get from clients who have non exempt assets, is, "can't I just sign it over to my cousin Fred"?  uhhh...no.<br />
The unrepresented debtor often doesn't gain a full understanding of how this works and why it is in place.  </p>

<p>4.   Income and budget problems</p>

<p>The means test and it's interplay with the debtor's actual budget is much more complex then it appears.  Courts are continually trying to figure the relationship out.  Failure to get it right, can lead to a judge dismissing the chapter 7, or the debtor may end up in a chapter 13 plan payment they may not be able to afford.  </p>

<p>All of these issues and others that unrepresented debtors encounter pose additional problems.  Problems that are not just a loss of assets or paying more then is affordable in a chapter 13, but also the potential loss of the bankruptcy discharge or worse criminal charges.</p>

<p>If you have serious debt issues, find a lawyer that has been doing bankruptcy for a while, disclose all assets, all transfers, all debts and your correct income and budget.  Doing it right upfront may save you loads of grief in the end.</p>]]>
    </content>
</entry>
<entry>
    <title>Consumer Bankruptcy Attorney Fee</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.arizonabankruptcylawyerblog.com/2010/07/cost_to_file_bankruptcy.html" />
    <link rel="service.edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.arizonabankruptcylawyerblog.com/cgi-bin/mt-atom.cgi/weblog/blog_id=259/entry_id=81899" title="Consumer Bankruptcy Attorney Fee" />
    <id>tag:www.arizonabankruptcylawyerblog.com,2010://259.81899</id>
    
    <published>2010-07-10T00:45:01Z</published>
    <updated>2010-07-11T06:08:49Z</updated>
    
    <summary>Bankruptcy law forces the attorney to &quot;investigate&quot; a client&apos;s financial affairs closely. This investigation, combined with the preparation, planning and all other work involved in ensuring a case goes well, takes time. More time than it did prior to 2005...</summary>
    <author>
        <name>Michael S. Anderson</name>
        
    </author>
            <category term="Attorney Fees and Bankruptcy" />
    
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.arizonabankruptcylawyerblog.com/">
        <![CDATA[<p>Bankruptcy law forces the attorney to "investigate" a client's financial affairs closely.  This investigation, combined with the preparation, planning and all other work involved in ensuring a case goes well, takes time.  More time than it did prior to 2005 when the Bankruptcy Code was dramatically changed.</p>

<p>Both prior to the law change in 2005 and after, a common question attorneys hear is..."how much does it cost"?<br />
The most common answer has stayed the same as well..."it depends".</p>

<p>It depends because every case has a different set of facts and every person is unique.</p>

<p>Despite this, we try as do most attorneys, to set a flat fee for bankruptcy clients after review of the situation.  For the price shoppers however, I am providing the following list of estimated attorney fees.</p>

<p>Under Median Consumer Chapter 7 - $1500-$1800<br />
Over Median Consumer Chapter 7 - $1800-$2500<br />
Under Median Consumer Chapter 13 - $1000.00 upfront remainder paid through plan monthly<br />
Over Median Consumer Chapter 13 - $1500.00 upfront remainder paid through plan monthly</p>

<p></p>

<p><br />
</p>]]>
        <![CDATA[<p>The following is a list of work that may add to the attorney fee.</p>

<p>1.  Litigation re discharge liens, relief from stay, valuation issues, claim objections, other<br />
2.  Reaffirmation issues<br />
3.  Redemption issues<br />
4.  Amendments/Modifications<br />
5.  Conversion of a case<br />
6.  Business related Bankruptcy<br />
7.  Tax Related Bankruptcy<br />
8.  Second Home Issues<br />
9.  Lack of client cooperation<br />
10.Extensive asset planning issues<br />
11.Changes in circumstance<br />
12.Emergencies</p>

<p>If you file for bankruptcy you must also pay the court a filing fee of $299.00 for a chapter 7 case and $274 for a chapter 13 case as well as take two "financial" classes that are typically about $60.00 total.</p>

<p>Most attorneys try to break the fees up into payments.  Very few if any, will agree to actually finalize a chapter 7 case and file it, without all of the fee paid in full.</p>]]>
    </content>
</entry>

</feed> 

